by Dr Manjir Samanta-Laughton | Jan 13, 2021 | Paradigm Revolution, Punk Science, Science
Despite the fact that The Black Hole Principle has successfully predicted many aspects of the universe and solved some major problems in astrophysics, some mainstream scientists may still have some hurdles to get over before taking the theory on board. In this article, we examine three barriers to The Black Hole Principle.
1. Consciousness is Fundamental to the Universe
The Black Hole Principle actually rests on the concept that consciousness is fundamental in the universe. This explains why we are unable to see beyond the Perception Horizon.
The light beyond this barrier represents vibrations of consciousness that are beyond what we call the speed of light which is beyond our normal perception. I am saying that this is the region of dark matter and dark energy.
Consciousness as fundamental is a conclusion that some physicists have made about Quantum physics that solves the so-called measurement problem – that the wave-function collapses into a point particle when we measure it. Some physicists have concluded that consciousness is therefore fundamental to the universe.
This is what The Black Hole Principle is also predicated on, that there are many levels of consciousness to the universe and we usually are only aware of what we call 3D.
2. The Speed of Light is not the limit of the Universe
I have just mentioned it but another hurdle is that The Black Hole Principle says that what we call the speed of light is not the limit of the universe and in fact, Einstein said that nothing with mass can go faster than the speed of light.
That is still correct. The speed of light renamed the Perception Horizon, is the point where the light coming from the centre of the black hole becomes matter.
Because mainstream scientists don’t understand that there are vast worlds beyond the speed of light, it makes it difficult for them to understand how massive releases of energy can occur such as in Fast Radio Bursts.
But when you understand that beyond-the-speed-of-light processes are coming into areas below the speed of light, it makes more sense.
3. It’s coming from outside of physics
Another hurdle is that The Black Hole Principle is coming from outside the scientific establishment. Although scientists such as theoretical physicist, Neil Turok admit that they are running out of ideas, they are still not open to them coming from outside of academia even if these ideas do solve their problems.
I am a medical doctor, not a physicist and I believe it is because I am not too attached to the mainstream narrative that the theory came to me in the first place.
In Punk Science TV, I have been highlighting lots of the issues facing modern astrophysics and the findings that don’t fit their theories. As this data comes flooding in, maybe we will see a change and mainstream scientists can get over these hurdles to embrace The Black Hole Principle.
Can you think of any more hurdles they might have? Please comment below this video. Thank you for watching and hope to see you next time.
by Dr Manjir Samanta-Laughton | Aug 3, 2017 | The Genius Groove
In this article, we shall be examining the science and quantum physics of Big Magic. In the book, Big Magic by Elizabeth Gilbert, she describes how she had an idea for a very specific type of novel with a particular type of plot and characters. Although she got a contract to write the book, she never got round to it as life intervened and she had the immigration struggle of her husband to deal with.
Elizabeth Gilbert, the author of Big Magic
By Steve Jurvetson from Menlo Park, USA (Amusing Muses) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
When she got back to the book, the impetus had left and she didn’t write it. So it was with amazement that she hooked up with another writer friend whom she had just met and not shared her plot with and essentially this friend was writing the same book only the details such as location had changed.
They had not conferred and there was nothing that the publisher could have said. Gilbert concluded that the book itself had needed to be birthed and as she herself had not done it, the idea had simply gone to someone else. Gilbert elaborates throughout the book on how ideas exist somewhere waiting to be birthed in partnership with us.
She admits that she doesn’t understand how it works. In The Genius Groove, I outline how, with the scientific knowledge that we currently have, we could explain the creative processes that Gilbert describes.
This model flips the usual explanation of consciousness around. Instead of consciousness and information being produced by the brain, the whole universe is created from consciousness as posited by some quantum physicists.
Even mainstream physicists discuss how all we can really know about the universe is information. When we get down to the tiny subatomic level, we find that reality is more ethereal than we first thought. When it comes to an electron, for example, we cannot say why it always has a charge. We don’t know what is powering it. We can just say that the information of an electron is that it has an electric charge.
Science tells us that the universe is filled with information. Is this the source of our creative Big Magic? (Videoblocks)
So even mainstream scientists would agree that a fundamental aspect of the universe is information. In the new model of creativity the brain is not the generator of consciousness or information as the brain itself is made up of atoms. The brain is an organ that has a particular purpose to act as a conduit for information.
Concepts from Quantum Physics say that we are living in a dynamic field of light the Quantum Vacuum. From what we have discussed before – we know this field contains information.
We can now put the science behind Gilbert’s experiences. Projects, Poems and books can exist in the field, ready to come through the brain of a ready recipient.
So the idea for the novel existed as a wispy idea in the information field ready for someone to receive and download the full novel. Maybe we should change the name from ‘Big Magic’ to ‘Big Informational Field Brain Processing’!
But I don’t think it will catch on. Essentially Gilbert has written a detailed description of her experience of creativity without proving a mechanism. Why should she? Science especially paradigm revolutionary science is probably not her thing.
Luckily we have a The Genius Groove for a fuller explanation complete with scientific references.
Check out The Genius Groove here for more.
What are your thoughts? Do you think that in Big Magic, Elizabeth Gilbert is describing the Quantum Field? You can comment below.
Image: Pixabay
