The supernova that refused to die and what it can tell us about our universe
There are many articles in popular astronomy news that attract my attention because they report cases where the universe does something that defies current explanations. This is for the simple reason that current explanations are actually outmoded and not how the universe works, therefore observations will contradict current theories.
The Black Hole Principle is a much more accurate picture of the universe, which will also be eventually superseded, but for now and the foreseeable future, it is our best fit for the universe.
I read many articles which follow a theme – The Black Hole Principle fit the observations much better than current mainstream theories. A great example of such an article is the case of the supernova that refused to die.
A Rebel Star?
This is the story of supernova called iPTF14hls spotted by scientists in San Diego 2014. At first, the behaviour of this supernova appeared to fit the picture of an explosion of a dying star. These supernova events can be so great that they momentarily rival the brightness of an entire galaxy.
Except this supernova iPTF14hls, refuses to play by the rules. Instead of fading away, it has actually been observed to become brighter. Astronomers expected the supernova’s brightness to dim over the period of 100 days but this did not happen. To topit off, a supernova was seen in this same location in 1954 which means this could be the same event spanning 60 years!
This errant supernova led astrophysicist, Stanford Woosley at the University of California, Santa Cruz to remark to Space.com, “I’m not sure, and I don’t think anyone else is sure, just what the hell is happening. And yet it happened, and so it begs explanation.”
When observation does not match theory
I had to giggle to myself when I read this article. Like so many articles on astrophysics that I read, this demonstrates one of the key issues in science today. Scientists are so wedded to their current models of how the universe works that when repeated observations come forward to show them that they are wrong, they do not know what to do.
This so-called supernova is a perfect example of Black Hole Principle behaviour. The model of the universe currently held by astrophysicist is that the universe is a violent place, full of powerful explosions of things dying and colliding. How else would they explain the powerful signals they see coming from various part of the universe?
But the Black Hole Principle provides a different explanation. These bright events are not the result of violent deaths but of effortless creation from points all over the universe from the micro the macro. As the light tumbles in from higher dimensions and reaches the Perception Horizon that marks the boundary between this so-called 3-D world and dimensions beyond, it can be very bright and powerful.
It is effortless power because it is fuelled by higher dimensional processes far beyond what we can generate in this dimension. But as I have described before, the black hole creation process involves breathing – so sometimes you see a lot of light given out and sometimes the process appears relatively dormant – there are seemingly random fluctuations.
This is what is happening in the case of the supernova, iPTF14hls. It is probably the same object that has been observed since the 1950s but instead of being a star that has exploded as it died, it is the sign of creation. Sometimes it will appear dormant as less light is being transferred from higher dimensions and sometimes it will outshine a galaxy as the light being brought in is particularly strong.
Sometimes objects across the universe show very rapid fluctuations that yet again do not fit the violent explosion model. Yet astrophysicists stick to their theories despite the data and observations being in opposition to them.
From violence to effortless creation
The insistence of astrophysicists on violent explanations is understandable when you believe that the 3-D universe is all there is. The fact that their own calculations have revealed that what we can physically see and measure makes up less than 1% of the universe with most of it being a mysterious dark matter, has not persuaded mainstream scientists that other realms exist beyond their imagination.
In the 3-D world below the speed of light, the only events that can release the sort of light we see from supernovas are explosions.
But if we open up to a universe that exists on many planes, we start to realise that the source of all that we see around us is not some distant Big Bang but the universe is being created all the time at every level from higher dimensions.
And as the light from higher dimensions breathes our world into existence, it is effortlessly powerful and has no set point, but moves one way and then the other.
Hence we observe objects that defy the current thinking in astrophysics but absolutely fit The Black Hole Principle. This process gives rise to the gamma-ray burst repeaters and a lot of other observations that currently confound astrophysicists.
One day, maybe the consciousness of humanity will evolve beyond the violent urges we have and our collective tendency for destruction. Maybe that is when we will be ready to receive the new, more accurate picture of worlds beyond the one we see with our eyes being the gentle source of power and creation for our world.
Is there a link between the Shroud of Turin and The Black Hole Principle? In this video lecture I explain how I think they might be connected.
But how did I get interested in this subject in this first place? On lazy Sunday afternoons by the fire, James and I watch tend to watch documentary channels. In the late 2000s a number of these featured the object called the Shroud of Turin.
Over the years, I had never really paid attention to this particular object. I had assumed as many other did that the object was a medieval fake.
But gradually, the Shroud gradually seeped into my consciousness and my curiosity was aroused.
From a scientific perspective, The Shroud of Turin is a fascinating object. I started to do talks on the subject and the response was immense. One of the talks has gone up on YouTube. I will link to it here.
In this talk I cover
What the Shroud of Turin is and some of its history
What properties does the Shroud have
Why nobody can explain how the Shroud was made
The story of the Shroud – what happened to the man who is depicted on there.
How new evidence published in a peer-reviewed journal is pointing to the Shroud not being a fake
My own ideas of how we can link the Shroud of Turin to the Black Hole Principle.
Let me know what you think in the comments below.
For the updated information about The Shroud of Turin and The Black Hole Principle plus many other subects like this, check out The Magdalene Mystery School.
In terms of studying consciousness, the Near Death Experience or NDE could be giving us valuable evidence indicating that consciousness continues after death. Indeed, the phenomenon of the Near Death Experience leads us to face a fundamental question; does our consciousness exist beyond the brain and body?
The Reductionist view
To the reductionists, this question is an easy ‘no’, as they believe that consciousness is an epiphenomenon of the brain, emerging from neurons as a side effect of electrical firings. To them, all humans are simply mechanical apes who have developed a few special faculties to give them an evolutionary advantage. In the reductionist world, the brain and body are machines and the primary agents of life – nothing is animating them. When death occurs, this primary agent of life is destroyed, end of story.
Over the years however, evidence of people having a conscious experience during periods of zero brain activity has accumulated. The concept that consciousness can exist beyond the brain challenges the reductionist belief system that the body is nothing more than its constituent parts.
Beyond the Brain
It is important to note that it is still a belief system though. There is no absolute proof that consciousness emerges from the brain. Professor Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona gives us a brilliant analogy. He compares the brain to a mobile/cell phone. Just because you can hear a voice coming from a mobile phone does not mean that your friend lives inside the phone.
If the phone gets damaged, you know that your friend is not affected; the phone was just receiving her voice. Schwartz says that the brain could be acting in a similar fashion – it is just a receiver and a conduit for consciousness, rather than the generator of it.
Hidden Science TV Special
As part of the Hidden Science series for The People’s Voice TV, I co-produced, wrote and presented a special on the Near Death Experience featuring guests:-
Dr Penny Sartori, A former intensive care nurse and the author of The Wisdom of the Near Death Experience.
Graham Nicholls who is an expert in out-of-body-experiences and the author of several books including ‘Avenues of the Human Spirit’
And Jazz Rasool a former physicist and molecular biologist who has created the Energy diamond Software.
Watch out for when we discuss black holes and the Near Death Experience. Enjoy!
When I received The Black Hole Principle through a vision in 2003, I knew it to be the truth of how the universe works. Pretty soon, the evidence for it started to mount up and as it did, it became clear that the theory was excellent at predicting the behaviour of stars and planets. But sometimes there is a real humdinger of a piece of evidence that is such a shockingly vivid example of the power of the theory that it amazes me all over again. So in this article, we will be looking at the Top 8 Predictions of the Black Hole Principle that even made me gasp.
1. Water comes out of sunspots
In 1997 a team at the University of Waterloo Ontario confirmed that water is found on the sun, specifically as steam ejected from sunspots. Now for a lot of people, this should be a total surprise; I would have thought that such news could send shock waves around the world. I am guessing from the lack of references to this that most academic scientists don’t even know about it. It seems so incongruent with expectations that it has been mainly ignored.
Back in 2006 Punk Science described how sunspots also display Black Hole Principle (BHP) behaviour. As we now know, that includes the production of water. So from this perspective, it is not a surprise that sunspots produce water because they would be expected to show the same sort of behaviour as galactic black holes and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes.
The Black Hole Principle involves a movement, like a breath at the Perception Horizon. When the breath goes one way, matter and antimatter are produced. When it goes another, gamma rays and light are produced. The actual particles differ according to the level of the universe you are talking about, but the process is the same.This is why we observe gamma-ray bursts that shine bright and then fade and events in space that don’t seem to follow the expected pattern of an explosion or another violent event.
So I was amazed to find that there are indeed clouds of hydrogen gas near the centre of the Milky Way called high-velocity clouds that appear to be breathing in and out. It could be a sign of the breathing process that is actually occurring in the central black hole itself that is being translated in the gas clouds immediately around it.
Very shortly after I had the vision of the Black Hole Principle I spotted this finding in New Scientist. Although it is quite an old discovery now, for me it was so important because it confirmed what I saw in the vision – that antimatter is produced in a black hole. It was this article that gave me the courage to move forward despite not being a physicist or academic, as I knew that The Black Hole Principle was important and was able to make predictions about the universe.
Image: ESA/Hubble, L. Calçada (ESO) Creative Commons Wikimedia
4. Antimatter comes out of thunderstorms
At the time of writing Punk Science, I stated that thunderstorms are basically powered by the same mechanism that is behind galactic core black holes and if so, we should be able to see fast-moving electrons (which we do), gamma-ray bursts which we do except we call them gamma-ray flashes and antimatter. At the time the latter had not been discovered, but in 2011 NASA made the announcement that they indeed found antimatter in thunderstorms.
One of the mainstays of the Black Hole Principle is of course that gamma-ray bursts are produced by the cores of galaxies. This means they should also be produced by our own galaxy which we found out fairly recently, also harbours a supermassive black hole. But just as the mainstream world was shocked when they found black holes at the centre of all galaxies, they were not expecting anything to come out of it either.
But in 2010 an analysis of data from the Fermi telescope revealed that our galaxy is actually blowing bubbles; gamma-ray bubbles are emerging from the supermassive black hole of the Milky Way galaxy.Again this was a surprise to mainstream scientists not expecting to see this sort of activity in our home galaxy and not sure what was causing it.
Further analysis of the image showed the characteristic bipolar jet of The Black Hole Principle. The bubble patterns seem to be created by the jets spiralling over time. Again a beautiful example of The Black Hole Principle behaviour found in an unexpected place.
Gamma Ray bubbles discovered from Milky Way (FERMI image copyright of NASA)
6. Moss grows in spirals
In 1997, biologist Fred Sack examined some Moss plants that had just returned from being aboard the space shuttle mission, Colombia. These moss plants were known to either grow towards the light or towards gravity. What is interesting is that out in space where there was no light to move towards, the plants grew in a spiral.I was so excited to read about this because according to The Black Hole Principle, the underlying fundamental force moves in a spiral.
This spiral force of light and consciousness gives rise to all the forces in physics such as gravity. Away from the light and from the Earth, the plants seemed to have tuned into the underlying pattern of gravity – a spiral.Sadly on a further mission in 2003, the space shuttle broke apart on re-entry and the crew was killed. Further moss experiments were recovered, however, reconfirming this spiral growth and this article was published in Nature.
For much of my life I have been preoccupied with the scientific world and ever since I was a child I remember people talking about the wish to find water on other planets. The idea was that as soon as we found water we would find life. Much to everyone’s surprise then, water turns out to be pretty abundant in the universe. What the mainstream scientists don’t understand is why. They come up with all sorts of theories about past collisions with snowball comets and asteroids.
However, according to The Black Hole Principle, water is actually produced from the black hole itself. More work needs to be done in this but I think it is a product of a higher dimensional process as the antimatter and matter split happens, water is produced much like in this diagram.
So it was not a surprise to me when the announcement came that Mars is actually populated by water that is being regenerated.That’s because I know that the planet Mars is displaying Black Hole Principle behaviour within its interior and that includes water production. So of course surface water is being regenerated just as it is in the sun, as the source of the water is the interior of the planet.
Discovery of water on Mars, Image: NASA
8. The Earth’s oceans come from the Earth’s interior
Speaking of water coming from the interior of a planet, the Earth itself is a black hole process showing the same types of behaviours as a galactic black hole in space. For many years it has been a mystery as to how the oceans of the planet arrived on the Earth.Various theories have been put forward including that in the Earth’s distant past, an icy comet collided with the Earth depositing its water and it has simply been recycled ever since. There was no proof of this though, but it has been received wisdom.
Knowing what I knew about the way black holes produce water through their dynamic processes and that this is happening at every single level of the universe, it was simply logical that the Earth’s oceans are being produced by the interior of the planet.So I made the public announcement and prediction at the Institute of Noetic Sciences in 2013 that the true source of the Earth’s oceans was actually the Earth’s interior.
Within about eight months it was announced by mainstream scientists that there is a massive ocean in the interior of the Earth. The answer to where the Earth’s water comes from seems to have been found.
Image: Graphicstock Illustration of comet hitting Earth and seeding oceans
Conclusion
The beauty of having a simple, elegant description theory is that it is simple enough to predict aspects of the universe as yet undiscovered. I have now gone on public record saying that we should expect to see evidence of antimatter coming from volcanoes so time will tell if this is correct. We have already discovered antimatter geoneutrinos coming from the Earth’s core so maybe this is all we need.
So far, The Black Hole Principle has been able to describe the universe in a more accurate way than many mainstream theories and to even expect some of the more seemingly bizarre observations. And that is what a powerful idea in science is all about – it is strongly predictive. If you would like to check out just some of these predictions take a look at Punk Science here. On the basis of this article, what are your thoughts on the predictions of The Black Hole Principle? Leave your comments below.
One of the biggest misnomers we still have in our society is that we defined by our genes.
We can even buy kits in the supermarket that give you a picture of your own genetics. The tagline is ‘the more you know about your genes, the more that you know about you’
Although this is what the manufacturers would like you to believe they really should know better.
Scientists have known for some time that there isn’t that much of a correlation between our personalities and other characteristics and our genome. But I will let Bruce Lipton tell you about what happened when scientists sequenced the human genome in this exclusive video.
I hope you enjoyed the video and our ‘guest speaker’ Dr Bruce Lipton.
When the director of the Hidden Science TV show, John Webster suggested that we do a show on Nikola Tesla I agreed, but I didn’t really know much about the great man. So I set about investigating his life in order to write the scripts for the Tesla special show.
Nikola Tesla By Photographer: Dickenson V. Alley Restored by Lošm
So I set about investigating his life in order to write the scripts for the Tesla special show. And what I found was perplexing. First of all most people think they know his story. No matter who I spoke to they would recite the same facts which go something like this.
Telsa was a forgotten genius.
He invented Alternating Current which is much more efficient than Direct Current and on which our modern lifestyle depends.
Due to this, Thomas Edison, Telsa’s former employer launched an attack on him and alternating current even convincing people that it was dangerous.
Telsa was aiming to provide the world with a free energy source that was based on Ancient Egyptian technology, but was stopped by JP Morgan.
He died penniless and forgotten despite making arguably the greatest contributions to modern life that a single individual has ever made.
With the collapse of The People’s Voice Television, we were left with an unfinished TV show. That is when my partner, James Gordon Graham stepped in to finish the production and editing. He also started to research Tesla’s life and together we shot another interview with James himself describing some of these findings.
Watch the show to find out more about our findings and from the other experts in Nikola Tesla but some of the most surprising are:
Nikola Tesla’s mother was also an inventor so he started young.
His father taught him telepathic skills.
It seems he did not die a penniless man but a rich one able to afford the New York hotel in which he spent his last days.
Watch the full show with Ana Capone, Ian Moore, Dale Pond, Harry Oldfield and James Gordon Graham here.
This sidebar contains carefully evaluated and recommended software tools. If you sign up for any of these offers, I will receive a percentage but it will not cost you any more.
Create your own online courses with the best all-in-one system.
