In this article, I shall be discussing the restriction placed on doctors to have their own personal beliefs and asking if there is a need for a new movement: Doctors for Spiritual Freedom.
Why me and not you?
“I don’t get it, how come you guys can talk about all this and yet I get hauled up for doing exactly the same thing?”The people sitting around the table looked at each other before one person spoke gently but to the point. “Because our families didn’t shop us to the GMC”Ouch! The response was sharp but true.
It was 2003 and I had just spent the afternoon with a group of doctors in a pub in North London. The conversation had nonchalantly drifted from the channelling of the Pleiadians to reptilians beings and more. Typical in any New Age gang you might say, but this was not a typical New Age group – these were working medical doctors.They included a highly qualified General Practitioner (GP), an academic doctor who actually taught at medical schools as well as a woman who had recently gained a PhD.
They were openly discussing channelling of the Pleiadians, UFOs and other subjects that would not look out of place in a David Icke event.Except this was a discussion amongst doctors – pillars of society who were expected to make life and death decisions on a daily basis about other people’s lives and in one case also shape the medical minds of tomorrow.
Reported!
The conversation was about the type of interests in spirituality that I had privately held for many years. Yet in 2002, such interests had been reported to the General Medical Council, the British Medical Board, by my ex-husband and my parents as evidence of my supposed mental illness.
When our relationship started breaking down, my ex-husband had accessed my personal computer and extracted channellings and writings that he felt could point to me as a person with bipolar disorder. He admitted later that he wanted to take revenge for me leaving him.The members of the medical profession who saw what he submitted had no other framework in psychiatry other than illness for my spiritual beliefs. Spirituality to them is nothing but the ownership of crystals and a bit of meditation to relax. I know this because I used to think like this myself before I had a kundalini awakening. I thought that spirituality was a trend of fashion that you adopt.
The Medics who are not MD
There is no concept in the medical profession that someone can have multidimensional experiences whilst remaining healthy and functioning as a person. To them, all multidimensional experiences whether they be out-of-body, meeting spiritual guides or psychic phenomena are either fake or marks of various psychiatric illnesses.To be multidimensional, according to the medical profession, is to be insane.
Once the evidence of my spirituality was leaked to the British General Medical Council (GMC) by my husband, I really didn’t stand a chance. Despite several psychiatric appraisals in which I was deemed healthy, the evidence provided by my ex-husband meant that doubts about my state of mind persisted. He had even stuck the knife in telling them about my interest in David Icke’s work.Hence, I was questioned by GMC psychiatrists on my belief in reptilian beings and whether I thought they were ‘out to get me’. I was interrogated about my so-called hallucinations in which I could see and speak with angels. I was also asked if I was being controlled by New Age Channellings – those typical ‘energy reports’ that come periodically.
The fact is, my interests and actions at the time were not that different from any other fairly developed New Age mystic: I channelled, I had visions, I had contact with spirit guides, I was interested in conspiracy theories, I was a qualified healer and used tarot cards.Yet I was also a medical practitioner making life and death decisions about babies with potential meningitis and administering flu jabs.
A Spiritual Danger?
In the eyes of the medical profession, the two were incompatible. This is despite the fact that none of the doctors who worked with me had any inkling that I had a spiritual side to me. I had never received a complaint from a patient or from a colleague. As far as anyone was concerned I was a typical, newly graduated GP. I certainly did not combine any complementary therapies into my GP Practice and I am actually against people doing so.So why couldn’t I hold my personal, spiritual beliefs without being persecuted? Even with the testimony of my family, surely an examination of the evidence would have revealed a person who was perfectly grounded and coping with life who simply had different interests and beliefs?
But it seems I was not allowed to have both – be spiritual and be a doctor at the same time despite there being no overlap as far as my behaviour in clinical practice was concerned. Those doctors I sat with in the pub were also hiding their interests from the public for fear of also being persecuted.
Free to be you and me?
It all leads to one conclusion; doctors are not free to be spiritually open. If they were openly spiritual, even if it did not interfere with their medical practice, their very sanity would be questioned.I also think there is a distinction to be made between spirituality and something like paganism. Paganism is seen as a religion with certain practices – it is something physical that people DO and an organisation they belong to, although of course, it can encompass genuine spiritual connection.
Spirituality doesn’t have any sort of organisation. It is something that people ARE.People can understand a religious practice – It involves something material such as a bible or crystals. But when someone is going beyond that and actually claiming to have contacts with other beings, that is when sanity is questioned. Because there is nothing in the medical profession that accepts that these experiences are real. They always have to be pathological hallucinations. So any doctor who has any hint of such experiences would be questioned as if they are fit to practice. I am sure I am not the only doctor who is spiritual and has hidden it.
Hounded out
The British public paid an enormous amount of money to have me trained as a GP. I only worked for a very short time in the NHS because of this hounding which was a huge waste of public funds. I hope that nobody else ever has to go through the horrors that I went through but until there is a paradigm shift and doctors understand that spirituality does not ipso facto mean insanity, this could happen again.
I am suggesting that we allow doctors to be free to be who they are even if they are spiritual. They should have the freedom to do what they want in their spare time as long as it doesn’t interfere with their medical practice and harm patients.The medical profession needs to realise that other realms of reality are real. People do not always have a healthy relationship with them as in the case of mental illnesses. But there are many people who do have a healthy relationship with higher realms and some of them happen to be doctors.
Doctors for Spiritual Freedom
As long as the doctors are safe and not trying to impose their own views into patients, they should be free to believe what they wish. This is very important for all belief systems. I once witnessed a Christian doctor insisting that homosexuality should be added to the patient ‘problem’ list. He didn’t seem to understand that it wasn’t a medical problem per se to be homosexual because he was blinded by his beliefs.
The same should go for all doctors. Doctors should be free to be openly multidimensional and spiritual without the fear of investigation as long as they are following the rules of their profession. In short, I am calling for a movement that gives Doctors Spiritual Freedom.What do you think? Please leave a comment below.
You probably have looked at satellite images of hurricanes and marvelled at just how similar their spiral patterns are to the spirals of galaxies. Intuitively there feels there is a connection between the two as if one fundamental pattern manifests itself throughout the cosmos. But could there really be any connection between hurricanes and black holes? New evidence points towards a similar mechanism behind the creation of galaxies and the creation of hurricanes here on earth.
A universal pattern?
We see spirals in everything from galaxies to pine cones. Looking at these spirals fills us with a sense of awe that there is something beyond the physical. That there is something unseen that is geometrically unfolding itself at many levels of reality and connecting everything in the cosmos.
The wonder of spirals Image: Pixabay
When it comes to hurricanes though, we have learned to distance ourselves from that sense of wonder. The experts say there is no connection with galaxies. They say that hurricanes are formed when water heats up and combines with complex factors such as high winds. This means that they usually form over warm oceans.
Interestingly, they do not form over all warm bodies of water, so what is going on? What really triggers their formation?
The Anatomy of Hurricanes
Scientists admit that they do not know some of the basic mechanisms of hurricanes, or cyclones as they are more generally called. I have found this article, for example, which gives a few possible mechanisms behind the formation of the ‘eye’ of the storms but admits that our theories are not complete.
If you perform a quick internet search for ‘do hurricanes have lightning’ will give you seemingly certain answers that they do not. The explanation given is that the winds in hurricanes are travelling horizontally instead of vertically. So why are thunder and lightning detected in many hurricanes if they, supposedly, should not have them?
The Destruction from Hurricanes Image: Pixabay
Understanding hurricanes and violent weather, in general, is of course of great human importance. Thousands of people die every year from hurricanes and they also cause great devastation to our communities and buildings. Hurricanes are the cause of great human suffering and the better we can understand them, the more chance we have of preventing this large-scale human devastation and death.
So fudging the mechanisms really doesn’t help anyone.
Big News! Hurricanes and Black Holes both emit gamma-rays
You probably know what is coming. I have big news! In May 2018, a paper was published that should change our whole perspective on hurricanes and how they operate.
Gamma-Ray bursts were detected in hurricanes and these have the signature of having been created by an antimatter positron beam. Lightning has already been detected for some time now within hurricanes.
So we now have lightning, gamma-ray bursts and antimatter found within hurricanes found most strongly near their centres.
It’s starting to look an awfully like The Black Hole Principle.
As you probably know by now, The Black Hole Principle states that the same pattern goes throughout reality from supermassive black holes in the centres of galaxies to even quarks. It is the same pattern expressed at different levels of reality. For some time now, I have been saying the Earth phenomena also fit into this black hole behaviour.
The Black Hole Principle
Instead of being guzzling monsters, black holes are actually creative. They give off jets and spirals of matter, antimatter and gamma-ray bursts. These emissions will happen in what seems to us a random pattern. The majority of the black hole actually exists beyond the speed of light. Light comes through the black hole, gets to the edge of our reality and splits into matter and antimatter. Sometimes these particles appear as electrons and positrons depending on what level of the universe is being observed.
This is why we see electrons almost at the speed of light coming out of black holes. And then sometimes they recombine and the matter and antimatter then form a gamma-ray burst. Water is often released as part of this process.
Could storms be mini black holes?
In Punk Science published in 2006, I stated that the Terrestrial Gamma Ray flashes that have been detected in thunderstorms are created by the same mechanism as black holes at the centre of galaxies. Since then, there has been much more evidence for this – NASA found antimatter from thunderstorms in 2010 and water has been found all over the cosmos including the largest body of water found in space in 2011.
So it turns out that Thunderstorms share many features with galactic black holes including producing water. It is the same mechanisms at every level of reality, it just looks different depending on which level you are looking at. So it is easy to predict what we should find in hurricanes if they are due to the same mechanism – gamma-ray bursts, fast-moving electrons and evidence of positrons as well as water production.
Evidence for the prediction – Hurricanes and black holes share characteristics
Image: Pixabay
With the discovery and publication in May 2018, we now have the evidence we were looking for that hurricanes behave in a way that is consistent with The Black Hole Principle.
I hope that with this new discovery we take the opportunity to understand hurricanes and other aspects of our weather and realise that the same mechanism is occurring here that happens in galactic black holes in space. In doing so we may be able to predict and even prevent some of the destruction that occurs due to these violent weather patterns.
In discovering gamma-ray bursts in hurricanes we open the door to a new era in science and one that could have major ramifications for humanity as a whole in terms of preventing future suffering.
I’m writing at a time when Tony Robbins, the well-known personal development guru is being slammed all over the internet for disparaging the #MeToo movement. A video has gone viral which was taken at one of his events that shows a woman standing up to him on his views. So in this article, I will be examining Tony Robbins, #metoo and asking if this is a new opportunity for compassion.
We don’t know exactly what was said just before the video that started the whole discussion but the clip begins with audience member, Nanine McCool explaining to Robbins that he might have misunderstood what the #metoo movement was all about. Robbins quickly interrupts her and explains what he thinks the movement is all about – people holding onto victimhood and trying to gain significance.
Misunderstanding?
So far in the conversation, you can just about put a case that he hasn’t fully understood what the movement is about and that he is asking people to not hold on to the victimhood mentality as it doesn’t get them anywhere. He does state firmly that he believes some people are using this movement to attack people to gain “a drug called significance to make yourself feel good”.
At one point in the video, Robbins physically pushes McCool back several feet and tells her not to push back to demonstrate his point that pushing back never works. Perhaps he has used this exercise successfully before before but in this context the towering man over the much smaller woman being pushed by him came across as intimidating and in a way demonstrating what the #metoo movement is about: powerful men and women using their physicality to overpower and intimidate women and men who are not as strong as them.
Even so far, you may characterise him as simply misunderstanding everything.
Victim/ Perpetrator Confusion?
Yet if you look at what he says next, there is no doubt that he believes the #metoo movement is bad. He explains that he knows powerful men, dozens of them apparently, who are not hiring well-qualified women over their male, less-qualified counterparts because the women are so attractive that they are seen as too much of a risk.
Amazing! Apart from the fact that he is basically describing illegal, discriminatory practices, he is confirming so much of what women already suspect – that we are judged on our looks and perhaps other factors such as fertility over and above whether or not we can actually do the job.
It is this statement of Robbins that is particularly offensive. It might also suggest that he himself has perpetrated some acts that he may not feel so comfortable with speaking up about. In fact, earlier in the video he tries to get the room on board with him by getting people to raise their hand if they have done something that they feel guilty about. I am personally not aware of any accusations against Robbins of any kind so this is purely a speculation based on his behaviour in this clip.
The Nature of Victimhood
Image: Shutterstock
I have personally never been drawn to his brand of personal development and his courses of any sort, although I did read one of his books years ago. I do recognise that in general, he seems to help a lot of people.
But in this article, I wish to discuss the earlier statements in the viral video with Nanine McCool – that he recommends that we do not stay in victimhood because I think there are many opportunities here to understand how to be more compassionate with each other.
When saying that people, shouldn’t choose victimhood, Robbins is talking about people who are victims of sexual assault and harassment. The woman who stood up to him, McCool, actually made a video on Youtube in which she described how she was sexually abused as a child. In fact, she demonstrates how much she has not stayed in victimhood because she is strong enough to have stood up to him.
But even if she was dwelling on things, does Robbins really suggest that as a person who was molested as a child that she should have immediately brushed it off and moved on? And that nobody should push back against child molesters and rapists because it doesn’t make us any safer?
The Shadow Self of Tony Robbins?
In the backlash against him, he has come out with something interesting that may be the key to not only understanding his behaviour that day but his whole philosophy. He said that he too was also molested as a child.
I think this may be the key to why he behaved in this way. I suddenly see a man in so much pain that he himself cannot process his own emotions. I haven’t said this publicly but part of the reason why I wrote The Genius Groove is that I saw a video with Tony Robbins in which he described how you shouldn’t dwell on your emotions and rise above them. This is the exact opposite of what my message is all about.
Facing the shadow
I have found over the years that unless you face these emotions when you are ready and strong enough to do so, they can have powerful effects on your life. We are actually a fabric of consciousness. I think that below the speed of light this consciousness can have charge and polarity. These are emotions and they are not some extraneous nebulous thing – they are who we are and they make up our very vibration. We all know from the law of attraction and sympathetic vibratory physics that like vibrations attract, so these vibrations are attracting what our lives are made up of.
So if we work on our emotions and truly resolve buried issues, from a vibrational perspective this will change the very fabric of who we are. But if you take Robbins’ advice you are just plastering over the cracks. It may work for a while but after some time your buried emotions will resurface.
Elevation and avoidance
Putting all this together I think perhaps Robbins is working from a place of severe avoidance of his own pain. He is telling everyone not to go into victimhood because he cannot connect to his own victimhood. He has learnt a strategy of not dealing with his emotions but elevating himself and pushing himself harder rather than facing those shadow aspects.
In a way, this reflects his whole career – to make a different ‘choice’, rather than face the shadow. His whole teachings can be seen in a new light of pushing himself into an elevated state in order to escape the pain of his own abuse. That might be why he reacted so badly because facing the true victimisation of people who have been abused and are standing up and discussing it, would be like facing himself and that is too painful. So perhaps that is why he interrupted McCool so quickly.
An opportunity for compassion
Image: Pixabay
In any case, it is a lesson for all of us that we need to truly understand each other. If someone has indeed been the victim of sexual assault, they are indeed a victim (at the 3D level in any case). They have had something done to them which they have no control over. It is up to them how they heal and it is is going to be different for everyone. Nobody can tell them that they need to get out of victimhood if they need more time to heal.
And if, because of our current changing attitudes, that person is emboldened to speak out against the perpetrator who has, after all, committed a crime, then we should support them, not slam the victim. Robbins is actually making the people accused of the assault and even the ones interviewing people for jobs into the victims. The victims of beautiful women trying to get a job and of being caught out for what they have actually done. Don’t forget we are speaking about the perpetrators of crimes here – job discrimination and sexual assault. Yet the actual victims of the crimes he shows no sympathy for in this clip.
I am glad that this has come to light for many reasons. Maybe Robbins will now actually take the time to understand the #metoo movement and has indeed pledged this. He has also modelled for us some of the prevailing attitudes that some people brush incidents of sexual assault under the carpet and blame the victim when they try and stand up.
I suspect also, as I outlined earlier, that due to his own abuse when he was a child he is avoiding facing his shadow emotions about this. Perhaps this is compounded by feeling that, as a man, he is unable to face his emotions about his abuse as many other men also feel unable to do.
The End of Ra Ra?
I think the way to move forward is not to vilify Robbins but to maybe understand where he might be coming from – his own emotional landscape and drives and how he is mirroring certain attitudes in our society. We need to make it safer for men and women to come forward and face when they have been sexually abused otherwise, they may not just want to put a cap on their own emotions but shut up anybody else who might trigger them.
Image: Shutterstock
Exploring emotions are the key to moving forward. So maybe this is the death of the Ra Ra when it means elevating your mood and attitude as an act of denial of emotional shadow. Papering over the cracks of your emotions and pretending they don’t exist is not going to work because, like with Robbins, they will eventually rise up to the surface to be looked at just as his emotional shadow has now.
I know this is a controversial topic and I appreciate respectful comments below.
The recent death of Professor Stephen Hawking has affected many people. Since the success of his best-selling book, A Brief History of Time in the 1980s, Hawking came to symbolise science itself and an archetypical ‘clever person’ with mysterious knowledge of the universe. That he had to overcome great difficulties due to a debilitating illness seemed to add to his charisma.
But it was not his public image that I was interested in but his science. Stephen Hawking had pioneering ideas about black holes that would profoundly affect me. So in the article, I wish to discuss the topic of Stephen Hawking and me.
Public Image vs Science
I never met him and I didn’t particularly wish to either. For me, he didn’t hold the glamour that he did for so many. Of course, I saw him as a courageous person who despite his physical situation, stood up for human rights and used his celebrity to draw attention to various causes and I admired him for that.
The general public saw him as the greatest scientist of our era. In the minds of many scientists, it was a different picture; he was seen a great science writer and communicator but most of what he wrote about in his best-selling books and his TV series was not his own ideas but the prevailing views in science that he elegantly and wittily conveyed to the public. You could argue that his greatest legacy was his substantial wit.
A Rebel Idea
But there was something else that in the furore over his celebrity that often gets overlooked. He was one of the first people to say that something could escape the vicinity of a black hole, thus daring to challenge orthodox concepts. He described his discovery in his famous book, A Brief History of Time and how the insight came to him as he was getting ready for bed in the early 1970s.
Back then, the concept of a black hole was fairly new. It was thought that they are dark, guzzling monsters ready to suck in everything in their path. Hawking realised that the quantum vacuum also exists in the vicinity of black holes. Virtual particles cycle from light to matter and antimatter and back again, just as in the rest of the universe.
He postulated that one of the particles may fall in and the other may be radiated out, which contradicted the concept that nothing could escape from black holes. Hawking realised that they weak radiation could escape black holes. This is called Hawking radiation and it was this concept that would provide one of the stepping stones for The Black Hole Principle.
The Path Begins
One day when I was browsing through a Waterstones bookstore in Hampstead, a book dropped off the shelf in front of me. It was called The Nature of Space and Time by Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose. I bought the book but was unable to understand much of the technical text.
Nevertheless, the incident made me look more into Hawking radiation. Later, when I had the vision which gave me The Black Hole Principle, I knew I was looking at Hawking radiation in action.
I knew, however, it wasn’t due to the destructive nature of black holes (which is a false concept) but their creative properties. At the edge of a black hole, particles of light split into antimatter and matter and are seen as radiation.
This indeed correlates with the data we glean from telescopes – matter and antimatter coming from the centre of galaxies at near light speeds and we measure streams of electrons come from the edge of a black hole. Although this is similar to Hawking radiation, he expected it to be much weaker.
A Lost Opportunity?
Nobel prizes are given once a prediction about the universe has been proven by observation. In my opinion, the evidence for Hawking radiation has been staring us in the face but nobody else has put the pieces together.
For many years I have finished my workshops by saying that we have just won Stephen Hawking the Nobel prize. Sadly I never got to tell him and he never did win the Nobel prize. He leaves this earthly plane not knowing just how right he was.
There he was: an unassuming, humble man telling anyone who would listen about his crystal technology. He even had photographs of the crystals he was growing in his laboratory, but I must admit I did not know whatI was looking at. Little did I know that he was about to change my life.
This was April 2001, in Albuquerque, New Mexico USA at a conference on science and consciousness. He gave me a copy of his article and I packed it in my suitcase along with the signed copies of books by William Tiller, Lawrence Fagg and a then relatively unknown author called David Hatcher Childress.
It was only when I got home and looked at the paper that I realised this unassuming man, who wasn’t even a speaker at the conference, was on to a really big scientific idea. His words resonated with me and made me feel like I was trying to remember something.
The man’s name was John Milewsksi and the concept that got my attention was that light comes out of black holes and creates all the forces of the universe. He called the light, Superlight and explained that there was one source: one force.
Background to Dr Milewski
I later found out some of the background to Dr Milewski. He is a retired Los Alamos National Lab scientist who is an internationally recognized leader in his field of Advanced Materials with more than 42 publications and 30 patents. He has several degrees in Chemical Engineering, a Masters in Metallurgy and a PhD in Ceramic Engineering. He is a former employee at Exxon Research Center and at Thiokol Chemical, Rocket Engine Division.
He is also an entrepreneur who founded his own research company called Superkinetic, Inc. to work on a revolutionary electric light bulb which uses a single-crystal-fibre filament, a permanent exhibit at the Smithsonian American History Museum.
For some years he has been known on the lecture circuit speaking on Ormus which is another area of his expertise and there are several videos online of him apparently making gold in a microwave.
Despite his credentials, I feel he is someone who just isn’t getting the recognition that he should be probably because of his understanding of the spiritual dimensions of the universe and how intrinsic they are to the way the universe works.
I saw him lecturing some years later and told him that his work had inspired me. I have emailed him since, hoping to send him a copy of Punk Science but received no reply. In my mind, he is one of the unsung heroes of science.
The Big Idea
Taking inspiration from the work of William Tiller who realised that the solution to Maxwell’s equations involving imaginary numbers, could have implications for our world. Normally we leave out the solutions that arise from the square root of a negative number which is called imaginary numbers in mathematics.
But Professor Tiller realised this could be describing a different type of radiation; whereas normal light is electromagnetic radiation then there is another solution that gives magneto-electric radiation or Superlight.
Superlight has a strong magnetic component and travels at the speed of light squared.
Milewski theorised that black holes are a source of Superlight radiation. He believes that Superlight is the singularity and the source of all forces in physics including gravity.
This is a quote from his paper on Gravity.
Gravity is not an attraction! It is the result of a universal pressure, exerted by SuperLight as it rains in from infinity, from all directions, onto every object.
When I had the vision that gave me The Black Hole Principle, my ideas diverged from that of Milewski’s in that I think the singularity of transcendent light is beyond that of the c2 but his concept of the one source: one force is true for the black hole principle too.
I think for me he is one of the unsung heroes of science because he correctly deduced that light comes out of black holes and creates all the forces of physics.
He definitely helped to inspire me. Who do you think are the unsung heroes and heroines of science? Please comment below and let me know. I may just feature them in a future article.
This sidebar contains carefully evaluated and recommended software tools. If you sign up for any of these offers, I will receive a percentage but it will not cost you any more.
Create your own online courses with the best all-in-one system.
